Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Blog Psychosis


Blog Psychosis


How do you know if you're at a crazy person's blog?

Or, how can blogging drive someone insane?

The atmosphere of narcissism that is embedded in the act of thinking, then typing, then posting a text to a blog is the same as in spoken conversation.

But the blogosphere records blog posts, so many people can read these inscribed thoughts and see these images, long after they were produced and published by the blogger.

Leaving a long chain of self-assertions, which we politely call blog posts, a trail, a stream of sporadic consciousness, in the blog realm is indeed different from spoken utterances. The distinct qualities of the blog enable certain sorrows to escalate into radical disturbances.

If, by looking back on your earliest posts, and following your mental coherence as manifested in subsequent posts, all the way up to the present, you feel you may be in trouble, don't worry very much. Although there is no cure for Blog Psychosis, at least you'll have plenty of company. Pass the creamer, please.

Some of these pronounced departures from mental health, induced by blogs and blogging, are described or manifested in so many other blogs, I will not trouble the reader with intricate analysis of them. Suffice it to say that Blog Psychosis occurs in five (5) major categories or states.

5 Major Areas of
Blog Psychosis:


(1) Blogistically Defined Ego: Spending too much time reading or writing blog posts, due to being obsessed with a blogistically determined self worth. The non-bloggy portion of the personality is being diminished by the erupting diarist identity.

(2) Discombobulated Blog Identity: Inability to be your bloggy self outside the blogosphere, resulting in a split personality, both of which are largely in the dark about the rapidly deteriorating dimensions of normalcy.

As blogger: you're funny and aggressive. Outside blogosphere: weak and inarticulate.

You're unable to resolve the conflicting selves, so you sell yourself short and engage in clinking or other social network delusions.

(3) Bloggy Ultra-sensitivity: Aberrant over-reaction to comments, lack of comments, TTLB ecosphere slidings, RSS subscriber mutiny, or shunning by other bloggers.

This is the pinnacle of over-blogging, the grand height of blog-induced pomposity, from the dizzying heights of which the blogger feels euphoric and elated, soon to succumb to the crash of ego-deflation in the real world.

(4) Blog-phantasmic Ordeal Syndrome (BOS): The emotive attachment the blogger feels toward their blog, and their blogger friends, is disfigured, due to exo-blogospheric turbulence, and takes on an insurmountable weight, because the blogger would rather deal with the endo-blog reality. You see this when all the blogger talks about is self, company, family, or ideology, all of which are falling apart due to negligence.

(5) Blogotonic Catastrophe: A more advanced stage of BOS, the blogosphere, and the blogger's imagined status or achievements within it, have now become the only thing that matters anymore, and it shows.

Health declines, clothes are soiled and tattered, and nobody comes over or calls anymore. When friends did visit, the blogger bantered vocally for a few minutes, but soon goes back to blogging, forgetting the presence of physical visitors in the room.

This can often be understood as an unrecoverable error, there being as yet no remedy for such an extreme disassociation from normalcy and consensus realism.


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Monday, November 28, 2005

Blog vs. blogoid object


Blog vs. blogoid object


I mention the term "Pseudo Blogging" so often, I thought it might be nice to offer you a fresh definition, and a closer look at a couple of common decepto-blogs.


"Pseudo Blog" definition

The pseudo blog is not a real blog, it's a false thing in disguise. It shares some aspects of the true blog, while it deviates sharply from certain essential features.

You've seen them, haven't you? These fake blogs?

They call themselves "blogs", or someone on the internet refers to it as a "blog", but when you arrive, soon enough, you notice things aren't quite right.

Something odd is going on.


Cut & Paste Pseudo Blog

This pseudo blog simply takes content from other blogs and slaps it in as a post. There is generally no original writing, no commentary.

Even VTG material has been stolen and inserted into these slimey things.

Very carnivorous and anonymous, slippery, disconnected bloggery garbage floating on the edges of the blogosphere, barely in the realm.


Link Spam Pseudo Blog

You see very little, or no, content. Instead, lists of links, usually to gambling, pharmaceutical, or real estate loan "businesses".

This is the type of blog comment spam commonly links to. I am mostly going by what I've heard, for I will not foul my computer by visiting a comment spam link. You risk getting infected with spyware, print command loggers, Trojans, and other malware.

But I have visited some of these Link Spam Pseudo Blogs, when doing a Technorati search on my blog titles, and I thereby detected one of these blogs linking to my blog, or to a post at my blog.



Comment-disabled blogoid objects

You go to what you think is a blog.

You read an interesting post. It makes you think, laugh, or get angry, maybe all three. Now, you're fired up.

The post has triggered a strong reaction in you.

You have something clever and relevant to contribute in response, but...

...you can't post a comment.

There are only "email this to a friend" or trackback functions, or no interactive functions at all. It's not a two-way communication vehicle.

You're face to face with either a valid "link log" (like Robot Wisdom), a blog that has no comments because it offers no commentary to the links it displays, it's a "pre-surfed web" blog, providing suggestions on interesting sites you could visit...

...or it's the dreaded, aberrant, unilateral "blogoid object".

I say it's not normal, because a blog's most distinguishing characteristic, besides being a revolutionary global self-publishing system based on universalized web content, is what it has in common with a slow chat room.

Blogs are conversation machines, not preaching pulpits. We already have enough one-way propaganda platforms for passive reception.

A blog post is meant to both inform/entertain and to provoke a reaction.

A blog post is responded to via a comment. Then another comment reacts to the post, the previous comment, or both. And on it goes. This is what makes a real blog.

A blog without comments is like a closed bulletin board that only administrators can post to. Visitors must shut up and listen, or not type and just read, then go away.

A non-comment enabled blog is like a Listen Phone, where the other side does all the talking, and you only have an earpiece to hear what is said, and cannot speak back. What good would that be?

A blog is an online conversation, where everyone's voice can be heard and valued to some extent.


Fictional Character Pseudo Blog

This is the type of fake blog that got the blogosphere all shook up several months ago.

A company needs a spokesperson. Some genius decides the CEO, Marketing VP, and Sales Manager are not suited or qualified to be that representative. So a "creative" person suggests they "invent" a personality to blog for the corporation.

Voila: instant recipe for sudden disaster. Customers don't like dealing with automated options on telephones, so what makes you think they want to interact with a blogger who's a Mysterious but Opinionated and Colorful Non-entity, or a Filibustering Donkey?

Mr./Ms. CEO, they mostly want to talk to you.

Not a cartoon or an imaginary person. Customers have real world problems to solve, and a Sagacious Talking Sandwich is not going to inspire any confidence in your company or products. Nor is it a wise customer loyalty-development strategy.

A character who does not exist, and who has adventures that never happened and illusory friends, how can this fantasy creature aptly present your corporate message and product line?

Ronald McDonald, Mickey Mouse, and a few other branded fictional characters could be successful as bloggers.

But to make up a character, with little relevance, or a contrived pertinence, and try to force it on the public, not good. They want to speak to a real live person, hopefully with authority to get something done, or tell someone who can.

There are also other types of Pseudo Blogs, which I've discussed in my archives, and I plan to discuss afresh in upcoming posts.


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Blogocombat: angry vs. passive


Blogocombat: angry vs. passive


I feel that my Vaspers Web Group, especially the blogs Vaspers the Grate and Blog Core Values, are a training system.

I'm attempting to train myself first, then others, in blog ethics and blogocombat. You really need both to be a New Super Blogger creating Blogosphere 4.0

What's worse?

Nice Wimpy Blogger: An ethical blogger who won't fight wrongs and malefactors, who trusts the delusion that everyone will like them if they try hard to please everyone?

Bloggy Hate Monger: An argumentative fight-picking blogger, with no moral goal, just showing off how clever or aggressive he can be?

I'll tell you what's worse, and all religions will probably back me up on this on. To your shock and dismay, the Nice Wimpy Blogger is by far, far and away, the worse. Give me the Bloggy Hate Monger any day.

This is not to say that I approve or incite random hate. Nor do I encourage bloggers to be bullies, sadists, or mind gamers.

I see the New Super Blogger-Blogosphere 4.0 realm to consist of soft-hearted, iron-fisted champions.

New Super Bloggers are highly intelligent, fearless activists for truth, justice, victory, free expression, democracy, universal compassion, and peaceful strength.

Sadly, it's easier to convert a Bloggy Hate Monger to ethical principles, than it is to get a passive, shy, timid Nice Wimpy Blogger to get some guts, some ambition, some furious fire about an injustice, scam, or act of brutality.

"Yeah, that sucks" is about all you get from the Nice Wimpy Blogger.

Then they go back to the comfort and pleasure of thinking about their own lives, what they possess, what they hope to have. I'm here to tell them what they'll never have: guts.


New Super Bloggers
of Blogosphere 4.0



I want all bloggers to be nice, but powerful.

Be charming, but stubborn.

Be sweet, but take a public stand.

Be smart and sophisticated, but mingle with the dumb and crafty.

Be kind, but hit hard and fast, when necessary.

Be open-minded and fair, but be a perpetually recurring nightmare to the enemy.

I'm not saying "stop being nice", although too much niceness can be a curse, especially in situtions that call for resolute conflict, confrontation, and combat. There's a time to smile and a time to scowl. A time to be gentlemanly and a time to punch a guy in the nose as hard and fast as you can. (Ecclesiastes paraphrase.)

If you're a Bloggy Hate Monger, sooner or later it will seem like the entire world is against you, you'll be so full of bitterness and hostility, you'll run out of targets and point it at yourself and the universe itself.

At this point, you'll seek spiritual substance to anchor the self. Then you'll be ready for the 9 core values of blogging, ready to join the war against the source of evil and stupidity itself.

I'll show you how, if you'd like.

You don't have to please me. You can be as passive and indecisive as you wish.

But what are you then accomplishing with your brief and sorrowful life? Self aggrandizement? But the unenlightened self is transitory, and has no intrinsic essence, longevity, or value.


Think of your fellow bloggers
who suffer for being bloggers...!


We need to stand for something more than paltry self-expression for self-centered auto-euphoria and vainglorious narcissism. So many bloggers fall in love with their own reflection as manifested in their self-expressive blogs.

But blogocombat heroes are hearing the trumpet call, and are serving the blogosphere with their fortunes, reputations, and even their lives. Some bloggers are inventing secret code language to bypass religio-fascist or secular-state totalitarian government censors. Some bloggers are being killed or imprisoned just for being a blogger.

Watch how the bloggers are swarming corrupt, selfish corporate behaviors. We, along with certain sectors of the MSM, and other activist segments of society, are even causing changes to occur. Product re-calls. Revision to corporate policies. Greater sensitivity to the Voice of the Customer and Individual.

Us nobodies, we're publishing blogs now. Now we will tell you how things are going to be from now on.

We blogocombat troops are making a big stink about anything we dislike, anything we feel is against the people, anything that is stupid, selfish, or bordering on criminal.

For example, the unseemly Sony rootkit DRM in recent music CDs.

Let this be a lesson in "Don't F*ck With Us, Mr. Corporation --yours truly, The Blogosphere 4.0"



[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

Thursday, November 24, 2005

The Vienna Conclusions



From Heise, Germany.

Microsoft, the "Vienna Conclusions," and the UN World Summit

http://www.heise.de/english/
newsticker/news/66619

[QUOTE]


The Vienna Conclusions drawn up for the UN's World Summit on the Information Society WSIS) were presented in an edited version in Tunis.

Digital Rights Management was inserted where "free software" used to be. It turned out that these changes were made at the request of Thomas Lutz, a member of the management board at Microsoft Austria, and ÖVP representative Carina Felzmann, who also heads a PR and lobbying firm.

The Chancellor of Austria published the text presented in Tunis. His office has yet to react to a query in this matter that heise online placed last Sunday.

Under the title ICT + Creativity, Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel (ÖVP) sent out invitations last June to a top-notch international conference for the WSIS. Microsoft was one of its sponsors.

In various panels on various topics, experts held discussions, with the results being protocolled in texts mutually approved.

These texts were collectively published as the Vienna Conclusions.

One of the panels was called Digital Rights / Creative Commons. Nii Narku Quaynor, then-CEO of Network Computer Systems Limited of Ghana and a former African representative at ICANN, chaired the panel.

Ralf Bendrath, political scientist at the University of Bremen and a monitor of the WSIS process for the Heinrich Böll Foundation, reported on the panel. Other participants included Georg C.F. Greve of the Free Software Foundation of Europe (FSFE), Richard Owens of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Georg Pleger of Creative Commons Austria, and Peter Rantasa of Music Information Center Austria (mica).

Bendrath and Greve were shocked when they saw the brochures distributed in Tunis (PDF file) (allegedly) containing the Vienna Conclusions.

Instead of the original text from "their" panel, they read a version that differed in several substantial respects.

To begin with, there was no talk anywhere of the "success of free software." In addition, the meaning of the section that discussed the revenue shift from content and digital works to services based on them had also been changed.

The statement that software should be seen as the cultural technology of digital society was watered down to "the practical and simple use of software."

Likewise, the following two passages popped up out of nowhere: "Commercial products bring innovation to the mass of consumers all over the world"; and "To ensure ongoing innovation, Digital Rights Management (DRM) development and deployment must remain voluntary and market-driven."

At first glance, this might sound consumer-friendly, but actually it is a jab against the EU's attempts to regulate DRM.

"DRM has nothing to do with innovation. The Sony rootkit also shows that there is nothing voluntary about DRM," argues Greve. "In Tunis, we tried to talk with the Austrians (about the editing of the text). But they were too busy celebrating the 'World Summit Award' and its funding with the sponsors."

When the television show ORF futureZone reported, "media professor" Dr. Peter Aurelius Bruck, "Editor-in-Chief" of the brochure that the Austrian Chancellor's Office published, started taking part in the online forum. While Bruck did not deny that changes were made, he did accuse the journalists at ORF of "misleading the public." After the conference he directed, he launched a public blog so that all of the texts could be discussed further. But Greve and Bendrath claimed that no one who took part in the panel was informed of this blog. Indeed, the blog does contain three postings on the content of the DNA Conclusions, two of which concern the Digital Rights / Creative Commons panel.

On September 27, three days before the blog was closed as announced, the entry "Comments from Microsoft Corporation" appeared, signed by "Thomas Lutz, Manager Public Affairs Mitglied der Geschäftsleitung Microsoft Österreich GmbH". He proposed that all of the passages that spoke of the success of free software or the revenue shift from content and digital works toward services be deleted altogether. Microsoft felt that they should not be kept because the goal of free software is to make it impossible for anyone to earn money from software. "This is so obviously stupid and nonsensical that it seems pointless to comment on it", Greve comments in his own blog: "Just another monopolist trying to uphold their monopoly by preventing freedom of markets – which is what Free Software really aims at."

The changes that Microsoft proposed were taken out without the members of the panel even being consulted. Further down, Microsoft successfully has the sentence concerning "innovation through commercial products" added to the text.

[snip]

(Daniel AJ Sokolov) (Craig Morris)


[END QUOTE]




What did the Vienna Conclusion state?

Here you go:

From Fellowship of FSFE blog


http://fsfe.org




[QUOTE]

...The conference used lots of formulas like "ICT+Creativity=Content", which also implied that "Content-ICT=Creativity". In this light, I guess what we've seen here is the good old formula

Sponsorship+Politics=Influence

And this is definitely not something that can be blamed on the Tunisian government, which has received a lot of heat during this summit. It goes to show things are never black and white here.

So this is the entire text of the workshop. Not the best text I've ever participated in, but -- especially considering all players involved -- also not the worst. You're invited to pick up the printed version and compare:


Text of Workshop 2 for Vienna Conclusions

Digital Rights and Creative Commons

Human creativity in its expression, results and distribution thereof is currently undergoing a massive transformation.

This fundamentally affects the rights of all of humankind. The rights of artists, musicians, scientists, writers, designers, programmers and other creative people must be preserved and strengthened to express themselves freely in their work, to develop and communicate through all media, and to determine how their works are used, including whether they are used for commercial or non-commercial purposes.

Because we all can be producers and distributors of content now, everybody should also have a right to get education that builds capacity and enables these cultural expressions. The public - as users, consumers, and citizens - has a right to access and use information and knowledge. This includes fair access to culture, but also a protection of fundamental human rights and civil liberties like privacy, freedom of expression, freedom of information, and the rule of law.

The new possibilities of content production and distribution also impact incentive structures and underlying economic models.

The worldwide copyright system is currently undergoing a transformation giving more choices to creators and users. Increasingly, revenue is generated not by selling content and digital works, as they can be freely distributed at almost no cost, but by offering services on top of them.

The success of the Free Software model is one example, licenses like "Creative Commons" that only reserve some rights and permit wide use and distribution is another. Distributed collaborative production models like Wikipedia also show that there are other incentives than money to create quality content.

In the digital age , the business models of copyright intermediaries will only be viable if they offer quality services on top of the content.

The challenge ahead is to develop an economy of sharing, collaboration and service that will, at least in the near term, coexist with the traditional economy of scarcity, control and technological restrictions.

Our knowledge and culture is the reservoir from which new content is created and in which creativity finds its fertile ground. It must therefore remain accessible to the public under reasonable and fair conditions. Copyrights and patents were developed in part to create incentives for production of quality content, and their role should be reexamined in order to meet this goal in the future while safeguarding the public interest in access to information and culture.

Software must be understood as the cultural technique of a digital society. With ICTs permeating all aspects of everyday life, software acts as social regulator. Similar to law, it controls essential parts of human interaction and creativity. Unlike law, it knows no exceptions and is ultimately binding.

It is therefore seminal for society to shape, make transparent and control the codified rules that in turn shape society. This is where freedom as a fundamental human right and prerequisite of democracy meets collaborative creative approaches.

Political freedom in the digital age depends upon technological freedom, which ensures access to the cultural heritage of humankind for present and future generations.


[END QUOTE]


One of the spooky parts of the Vienna Conclusions, as I first read it, must surely be this:

"...the traditional economy of scarcity, control and technological restrictions."

What this means is that certain forces will perhaps try to keep information "scarce", they want to "control" it, and they want it to be difficult to share, due to unnecessary "technological restrictions", e.g., something like this: only a certified webmaster should be allowed to operate a web site, blog, or wiki.

I see a subtle attack on the wilderness of the web, the bellicose anarchy of the blogosphere, the unpredicable, unlicensed, uncensored exchange of ideas worldwide. There seems to be a desire to create a priesthood of caretakers, which is code for thought policing.

The UN seeks to control the internet, web, and blogosphere.

This cannot be allowed to occur.


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^0

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

MSM and Blogosphere merging?




MSM and Blogosphere merging?

We are seeing the MSM attempt, sometimes indirectly via stupid bloggers, to invade and regress the blogosphere.

MSM wants to regress, make go backward, the blogosphere. If they can't kill it, they wish to warp it into their narcissus mirror.

MSM wishes to gaze into the political/journalist sector of the blogosphere, and see their own encouraging, substantiating smile returned in the image. And it's the image that sucks.

The image the MSM was created in was originally that of the people. What the people wanted, or needed to know. The image eventually devolved into the media being simply a sickly puppet of whoever paid to control the strings--religion, government, big business, or worse.

The media are the strings. The money and power manipulate the strings, as the mainstream audience, even the educated members, gaze in translucent hypnotic indeterminacy: meaning, easy to convert to any idea.

Having a tranced-out passive audience, a target audience that was everybody with a telefusion set (tele = at a distance, fusion = mental merger with the spot of light on a screen that expands into a full blown optical seduction with stories).

Telefusion was the ultimate MSM machine. Sleepy frowning robots, loaded with worries and coveting, ripe for tricked expenditures, inhabited the land now, swarming into mass windows of opportunity. It looks at you, via market research, as you watch it.



Then the blog came along.

Everybody, as though on cue, woke up from the MSM induced nightmare of eyes-wide-shut obedience.

Bloggers rose up against all wings of politicians, MSM flunkies and jerks, and other bloggers. Blogocombat was born on the bloody fields where Dan Rather and Trent Lott collapsed. Blogocombat has war-lust gleaming all over it, war against the strongholds of deception.

Will the blogosphere remain aggressive and free?

Will it continue to be the unvarnished, rough edged voice of the individual?

What changes are occurring in the blogosphere, that the blogospheric defense forces are not picking up on their radars?

What blogo-doppler can predict the next wave of genius or misanthropy to attempt to invade the blogosphere?


Now you can decide this one for yourself.


From Ad Pulp blog

http://www.adpulp.com

"Craig to Branch Out Beyond Classifieds"
by David Burn
November 23, 2005



[QUOTE]


Guardian Unlimited: Craig Newmark has already revolutionised classified advertising in the US with his hugely successful website, craigslist.com. Now he is planning to shake up journalism, which he says has "lost the trust" of the public.

The founder of the free classifieds site - the seventh most popular website in the US in terms of page views - is to launch a major online journalism project within three months that will copy his "wisdom of the masses" approach to advertising and apply it to journalism.

"Things do need to change," Mr Newmark said. "The big issue in the US is that newspapers are afraid to talk truth to power. The White House press corps don't speak the truth to power - they are frightened to lose access they don't have anyway."

Craigslist, which began in 1994 in the San Francisco Bay area as an information service, decides its business strategy almost entirely by following up on the complaints and suggestions of its users.

Posted by david burn





Comments

If Craig wants to bury the already dead MSM, he should think of all the things wrong with it, not just the part that's easy for him to transfer from Craigslist.

The negative slant prompts me to refer to it as the Morbid Stream Media. Always the negative, bitter, cynical, rain on your parade gloom from these freaks who pretend to be objective.

"Dan Rather really WANTED to believe the story was true": an MSM freak defending the poor research and overt bias of an objective news organization. As if this really WANTING constitutes a reasonable and fair motivation for Rather to stubbornly, unrepentently cling to his delusions and political mania.

Please don't import, Craig, the slime of the MSM along with the suspicious goal.

C-Span is the future. CNN is the past.

Posted by:steven streight aka vaspers the grate on November 23, 2005 12:53 PM

[END QUOTE]


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

Blogomedia vs Blogosphere 4.0


Blogomedia
vs.
Blogosphere 4.0


[NOTE: This is an exact replica of a post I published at Vaspers the Grate.]

One of the major blogocombat and blogoconstructivist projects I've been working on since early 2004, now going into 2006 with even more aggression, is Blogosphere 4.0

Blogosphere 4.0 is the forced evolution of the Blog Revolution from the Information Reformation that was Blogosphere 3.0 and into the multi-media, omni-functional mega blogs of Blogosphere 4.0.

Blogosphere 1.0 was Tim Berners-Lee and others who began "What's New" pages on the early internet and then the web. It consisted mainly of simple lists of other network locations and a brief commentary on what you'd find there. Thus, the first blogoid objects, the tech/dev update pages, were Link Logs. Not "diaries" of personal trivia drivel without focus or purpose.

Blogosphere 2.0 was when it became a geek trend to put up a variety of personalized pages, still generally oriented to the subculture of networked geeks, but adding ideological asides. This is where the "smart mouthed, sharp tongued blogger" arose in all its radiant energy and finesse. Blogocombat was born in corporate blogs, that were called "online gaming forums" at the time. Business blogs, or more accurately, product loyalty mosh pits, were filled with one geek hating another geek's favorite OS, computer brand, or industrial noise band.

Blogosphere 3.0 was born with Blogger, LiveJournal, Xanga, Metafilter, Technorati, and other factors that made it possible for non-geeks to have a personal page, or more precisely a constantly expanding book of pages called a "blog". Now anyone could, did, and does have a blog. That's both good and bad. Good because each new voice added to the blogosphere is another blow against the empire of MSM information hegemony. Bad because every crap blog does its part to lower the overall credibility, usability, and information value of the blogosphere.

Blogosphere 4.0 is now forming, based on the 9 core values of blogging, the fast pace of new blogging tools and communities, and a declared and definitive Total War Against Information Hegemony by religions, governments, corporations, and MSM mainstream media. The New Super Bloggers are being trained and unleashed, with Vaspers the Grate Web Group (VTG blog, Blog Core Values, Sleialgnion, Art Test Explosion, etc.) helping the transformative process.

Nothing is inevitable except uninevitability itself. Please keep that in mind as we now ponder...

Blogosphere 4.0
vs.
Blogomedia



This article represents a brief and necessarily tedious introduction to the vast subject of What the Blogosphere Is...and Shall Maybe Become.

The following quoted text is from Open Source Media/Pajamas Media's "About [OSM/Pajamas Media]" page, a "letter" entitled "From the founders", an explanation of what I call "blogomedia".



[QUOTE--with STREIGHT running commentary embedded.]



From the founders

"Free speech, not free beer!"

[STREIGHT: ...but free beer isn't such a bad idea, either. Free beer just might make everybody's speech a tad more free, free and easy, free and even savage.]


In 1985, that's how the Free Software Foundation first described an idealized world wherein innovative ideas would flow freely though the collaborative environment of the internet. In casting about for a term that would denote freedom, not freebies, those who followed FSF coined the term "Open Source," intending it merely as a reference to the "source" code in which they programmed. It turned out to be much more than that.

The open source ethos helped drive the great boom in information technology that made the internet ubiquitous in the 90s and led to the creation of over 20 million personal weblogs--or blogs--in the first half of the oughts. But the term "Open Source" had a ring to it, as did the idea behind it, and the notion quickly spread, leaping to other fields. Linus Torvalds, the father of the open source operating system Linux, once said, "The future is open source everything."

[STREIGHT: What about Blogger, LiveJournal, Xanga, WordPress, Typepad, etc.?

How about the reduced home computer prices, low-cost dial up connections, expanding broadband availability, net music labels, iPods and podcasting, emachines, HP printers, Best Buy, designing with web standards, Google search, RSS/Atom feeds, Firefox browser, Windows OS?

All these, and many more factors, contributed greatly to the popularity of blogs and the historically significant speed of the blogging trend. Odd that "open source" is given all the honors of begetting Blogosphere 3.0 and its organizing philosophy.]


At OSMTM (Open Source Media), we believe that to be true—that freedom, openness and transparency in media is an inevitable

[STREIGHT: Whoa, hold on right now, what "freedom"? what "transparency"? what "inevitability"?

Some bloggers are free, others write in subversive code talk. Some blogs are transparently sincere, with upfront owner identification, staff bios, working links to reliable sites, easily found contact information, topic consistency, and trustworthy endorsements/testimonials/word of blog mouth. Nothing, like I said, in the blogosphere is or will ever be "inevitable". The inevitable crumbles before the onslaught of the fiercely advanced possible.

Sure sign of sloppy thinking, this "it was inevitable" business: a hind-sighted, after-the-fact phrase.

It was not looking "inevitable" while the idealistic innovators and implementaton pioneers were wrangling with it. It didn't seem "inevitable" to investors, nor was the general public much impressed.]


result of the technological advances

[STREIGHT: It's not just "technological advances" that create democracy, free expression, independent, non-conformist thought. There has to be an underlying philosophy.

Look at Red China, North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia for technology without correct philosophy. A certain morality, a foundation for freedom and human rights, must prevail, and not just raw "technological advances".]


that have given every citizen the chance to breathe deeply of the news, thought and opinion that hovers in the ether between us.

[STREIGHT: Is that what you call what "hovers in the ether between us"?

I think we must examine and explain what this "news, thought, and opinion" really are, and why "facts, faith, statistics, research data, photos, digital art, cartoons, audio theatre, scientific webcasts, project collaborations, PDF files, music, video, podcasts, comedy", etc., are excluded from this vision of the mythical, illusory Blogomedia.]


Readers unfamiliar with blogs are sometimes puzzled by the concept, thinking that they are mere online "diaries," where egoists and sentimentalists

[STREIGHT: omission--"and political pundits, usability specialists, college students, interns, web designers, bored lovelorn teenage mall rats, scientists, economists, anthropologists, mommies, police chiefs, and others..."]

record their thoughts and feelings

[STREIGHT: how are feelings expressed but via thoughts via text via typing? Also they record or display facts, stats, figures, critical analysis, photos, digital art, computer games, podcasts, interactive devices, mp3s, etc.].

But the phenomenon of blogging is much more than that; it's the modern equivalent of the Gutenberg revolution, a way of putting not just published material in the hands of the public—but publishing itself.

Where journalists once gave us "experts say," blogs give us the experts themselves.

[STREIGHT: "experts"? maybe--plus a buttload of nincompoops, ninnies, and no-skill numbskulls.

To err in delusions of grandeur makes the blogosphere open to legitimate sarcasm and disparaging remarks. A sober assessment of the blogosphere's advantages and problems is mandatory.]


And where faceless, "objective" editorial boards once handed down opinions and endorsements, bloggers sound off, the numbers on their public sitemeters lending them unassailable credibility as voices for the rest of us.

[STREIGHT: This "numbers on sitemeters" and "unassailable credibility" are false assertions, exposing an extremist view, a fantasy blogo-utopia that cannot and will not exist, where every blogger is nice, trustworthy, ethical, sincere, charming, intelligent, and soothing. And tells you what you already understand or believe. Yawn. zzzzzzzz...

The number of hits a web site or weblog gets is no indication of value, authenticity, or trust. Many hits could have been curious web surfers attracted by hype and alienated by content, never to return. This is like judging the literary, intellectual, or moral superiority of published books by number of copies sold. Or the musicianship of a band by total CD sales.

Popularity can be based on other considerations than "credibility" or "integrity". Often, a comical writing style or prior celeb status helps a blog gain readership. Some blogs are like vanilla trainwrecks: bland performances of lonely isolates that captivate and addict with nudity, odd anecdotes, or nasty language and rantings of clinical madness.

"Numbers on sitemeters" is an attempt to convert the New Non-media of Blogs into the Old Mass Broadcast Media parameters and terminology, called "message receptors" or "market reach" by advertising, "target audience" or "pairs of eyeballs" by marketing buffs, and "butts in seats" by Hollywood.]


OSM's mission is to expand the influence of weblogs by finding and promoting the best of them, providing bloggers with a forum to meet and share resources, and the chance to join a for-profit network that will give them additional leverage to pursue knowledge wherever they may find it.

[STREIGHT: Er, don't I already enjoy such liberties and powers now, without you? And that "pursue knowledge wherever they may find it", not the most exciting user-benefit promise I've ever seen, means "pursue the knowledge we say is knowledge, which you'll find right here on our website.", does it not?]

From academics, professionals and decorated experts,

[STREIGHT: Experts are now "decorated"? all lit up like a Christmas tree? I'm an expert on blogology, so who will decorate me? Make it gothic country bubblegum style, please. Not Pink Freud.]

to ordinary citizens sitting around the house opining in their pajamas, our community of bloggers are among the most widely read and influential citizen journalists out there, and our roster will be expanding daily.

[STREIGHT: This "roster...{that is} expanding daily"...now, what does that remind you of? The blogosphere itself perhaps?

If your blog is sucking the "best bloggers" into it, isn't this an abnormal Sub-blogosphere?

If your roster expands daily, I know for sure I won't have the time or energy to read it daily. Too many bloggers in one measly blog.]


We also plan to provide a bridge between old media and new, bringing bloggers and mainstream journalists—more and more of whom have started to blog—together in a debate-friendly forum.

[STREIGHT: A "debate-friendly forum"?

Is this a forum that's "friendly" toward debates as a concept?

Or is it a wimpy "debate forum" that is "friendly", well-behaved, sedate, boring, monotonous, limp, tiresome, snobbishly dull? The emaciated, castrated "Bloogosphere" or "Blogomedia" where everybody gets along without any harsh words or disruptive ideas. Bah!]


In the 1960's, the medium may have been the message, but in the new century, it's time for the medium to get out of the way.

Call it the blogosphere, call it citizen journalism, or call it (we hope) Open Source Media—but the next phase in the democratization of ideas has begun. Stick around, read some blogs, and come back often. Our door will be open.

[STREIGHT: How is this contrivance any different from a typical "portal page" that MSN, Google, Yahoo, etc. try to attract us to? "Start at this blog--and may your further adventures and explorations, with us as your perpetual starting point, be merry and fruitful." Y'all come back now, y'hear? Hillbilly aesthetics.

The "next phase" is not this Blogomedia utopia of sleazy MSM journalists shaking hands with stoner pizza mongering blawggers. The "next phase" will be what I declare it to be: Blogosphere 4.0 with the taste of vengeance in its sharp-tongued mouth, a massive, all-out assault on the MSM and religio-politico-corpo information hegemony.]



Charles Johnson

Roger L. Simon


[END QUOTE]


Thanks to Paul Woodhouse of the Tinbasher blog for notifying me about this scandal. Who shot whose dog with a rifle?


I am the Sign pointing to the Light.


Vaspersians arise and take over the Blogosphere 3.0

(using posts, comments, emails, trackbacks, web forums, RSS feeds)

thereby transforming into the Blogosphere 4.0


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Buddha fire sermon and blogging


Buddha fire sermon
and blogging


This teaching by Sakymuni Siddhartha Gotama, the "buddha" (awake one), pretty much explains everything. It was presented shortly after his enlightenment.

I will relate this "fire sermon" to blogging.

(Buddha image from Buddha Net web site)

Fire was a false, deceptive idol that the ignorant Brahmins considered to be "male", the god "agni". Buddha wisely observed that fire worship contains cruelty, violence, patriarchal repression, and other obnoxious elements.

For more background on this, see the information at the University of Miami on The Fire Sermon.

http://www.as.miami.edu/phi/
bio/Buddha/firesermon.htm

[QUOTE--part of the Fire Sermon of Buddha]

And there The Blessed One addressed the priests:—

"All things, O priests, are on fire. And what, O priests, are all these things which are on fire?

"The eye, O priests, is on fire; forms are on fire; eye-consciousness is on fire; impressions received by the eye are on fire; and whatever sensation, pleasant, unpleasant, or indifferent, originates in dependence on impressions received by the eye, that also is on fire.

"And with what are these on fire?

"With the fire of passion, say I, with the fire of hatred, with the fire of infatuation; with birth, old age, death, sorrow, lamentation, misery, grief, and despair are they on fire.

[END QUOTE]

Buddha goes on to explain how all the senses, sense impressions, and ideas created by dependence or attachment to these impressions, are all "on fire".

As Ecclesiastes states: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, the ear is not satisfied with hearing.

EXAMPLES:

* A music lover never has enough CDs (I can vouche for that!).

* A sex addict never has enough sexual adventures.

* An alcoholic will probably drink himself to death.

* A glutton gets fat and may die of obesity-related sickness.

* A politician never has enough people kissing his skanky ass.

This is the law of craving, which leads to sorrow whether the craving is fulfilled or denied. Both satisfaction and deprivation of inordinate pleasures result eventually in suffering.

Capitalism, unfortunately, is largely based on craving, keeping up with the neighbors, possessing more and more materialistic crap. What you have is more important than what you are morally, intellectually, altruistically.

What is craving vs. right desire? Craving is seeking and demanding what you don't really need to survive, function professionally, or be your best in this world.

For example, a salesman may need more suits than a carpenter. So for the salesman to desire a new suit may not be a wrong wish. But to want an extremely expensive suit just to show off how much money you have is terribly wrong-headed and ridiculous. I especially hate to see these asshole televangelists strut around with shiny expensive suits and big gaudy gold jewelry. Those televangelists are a million miles away from Jesus and the gospel, no matter how "good" they "preach".

When your craving is satisfied, the satisfaction reinforces the wish for more, and more, and more.

Whey your craving is not fulfilled, the deprivation causes the craving to rebel against the impediments, making you miserable.

You become unhappy because you can't have what you lust for, whether it's power, music, food, drugs, sex, prestige, trinkets, etc.

An item that makes a person happy or "high" soons causes the person to want, then strive for, then demand, then perhaps even seize by any means.

As a blogger, we should not "crave" comments, A-listing, popularity, or fame.

What bloggers ought to do, in my view, is to Keep Perfecting your blog, your posts, your responses to comments, and your comments that you post at other blogs.

Keep Perfecting. Forget Craving. Keep Perfecting.

If you must crave, crave Perfection, more complete wisdom, based on your desire to be always bringing wonderful benefits to your blog readers.

[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Monday, November 14, 2005

Blog Topic Selection System


Blog topic tips


Have you ever wondered what to blog about?

Ever felt frustrated, having nothing to say?

Have you perhaps even felt close to just giving up, and not blogging anymore?

Please wait. Don't give up. Maybe I can help you figure out what to say. I may be able to give you a Blog Topic Selection System you can keep in the back of your mind.

Here it is.

I think all these pointers apply to all types of blogs: personal, business, political, technical, journalist, artistic, religious, etc.

a Vaspers The Grate
***Exclusive***

Blog Topic Selection System



(1.) Other Blogs.

Visit another blog you admire, in the same topic field as yours. Read a few recent or archived posts, then react to something they said.

Or visit some other blog that's in a very different field, read some posts, and try to think of how some information in it could be of benefit to your readers. Quote some of the information, with proper credits (notice how I do it in my blogs: author name, blog title, date, typed URL and hyperlink the title of the article so readers can quickly go to it, [QUOTE] and [END QUOTE] markers indicating what is being quoted.).

WARNING: Some blogs or web sites will not allow you to quote anything at all (usually uptight MSM news sites), or severely limit quotes to a few sentences (Joel Spolsky's Joel on Software blog, for example).

(2.) Reader Needs & Interests.

Think about what you know about your readers. Think of comments they post on your blog. Do your comment posters ask for clarification on anything? Do they like music? Do they like art? What type of readers are you hoping to reach? Write something that will draw such readers to your blog when those people do a Google search on a related key word or phrase.

What expertise or experience do you have that might benefit your readers? Write about that. Or go get some new information online or in a library, and after you've done enough research, write about that.

Nearly everybody needs to know more about HTML, safe web surfing, computer security, network security, prevention of Identity Theft, keeping young people from online predators, web design, RSS, tags, digital art, digital cameras, blog template tweaking, how to add images to your blog sidebar, and so forth.

(3.) Blog Visitor Stats.

View the web statistics on your blog, through whatever site stats service you use. Do you have a lot of readers in Africa or Belgium? Maybe you could write something about something related to their culture, their food, their traditional music styles, whatever.

(4.) Raging Blogosphere Controversies.

If you're reading this sentence on this blog right now, you're already in the center of the maelstrom of blog debates. I try to stay current with the blogospheric controversies, such as character blogs, comments enabling, blogs vs. MSM, and such. Other blogs also deal with such things.

Another way to stay up to date with blogo-combat is to Google various words or phrases related to various topics of debate.


(5.) Serious Issues of the World.

You could write something about disaster relief, Islamo-fascists vs. good Muslims, world hunger, pacifism vs. war-mongering, etc.

I personally avoid most of these issues, because I'm basically non-political. But I did post a lot about the Iraq elections, and some about the UN wanting to control the internet, the McCain-Feingold insanity about blogs being political financial-equivalent contributions, and debt relief for Africa.


(6.) Poetry, Literature, Art, Music.

Variety is great in any blog. So try not to post the same old stuff all the time. I tend to like to express my rage at mediocrity, stupidity, and the mainstream media. Thus, I have to deliberately think of less angry things to post. One guaranteed way to add variety and light to your blog is to pick up a book of poetry or classic literature, read something, then quote it with proper credits, and make some observations about it.

Or write about some artist, artwork, musician, or music that you like, or have recently discovered. Most people have some interest in artistic and philosophic items, as long as you keep it simple, interesting, and relevant to other aspects of life. I write about net music labels, deconstruction, and literary figures like Proust and Rimbaud now and then.


(7.) Television, Films, Radio, Podcasts.

You could write about something you saw, read, or heard on other media.

For example, I saw on tv a 60 Minutes report about 13 guys, paramedics from New York City, who were the only medical help in the Kashmir region of Pakistan, Taliban/Al Queda country, where the earthquake hit. These brave NYC paramedics were there just to help the injured and sick, but as a consequence of their benevolence, the Pakistani people were seeing America in a new and loving light.

The paramedics were winning hearts and minds, and stemming the tide of terrorism, without that being their main intention. This would be a perfect example of something to write about.

(8.) Personal Experiences Relevant to Others.

Finally, let me suggest you think of a conversation, episode, past job, family situation, or anything that happened to you. What did you learn from the event? What do you regret? What are you proud of? Could relating this event make others laugh? Make them smarter?

We all have interesting personal anecdotes, funny stories, weird events, that others could benefit from knowing about. You could write about them once in a while, letting your unique personality shine through.

How about the time I found a rat swimming in a toilet I was getting ready to sit on, at ACT Bending & Steel, a factory I worked at, located by the Illinois River. Have I ever told you how my foreman came in, hobbling because his girlfriend had shot him in the leg with a pistol, and how he smashed the toilet and rat with a huge iron crowbar? Now you know.

Too much of this can backfire. So be careful not to blabber on and on about personal trivia that others may consider too self-centered and not relevant to their own lives. Too much drivel about your baby, your web design genius, your hatred for the MSM, George Bush, or Hillary Clinton, too much private ax grinding of any type can repulse people. I have to be careful of this myself, so I'm preaching to me as well as to you.


There you go.

Have I forgotten something?

Do you have some other method for coming up with blog posts?

Email me, or post a comment. Thanks.

[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Individualism and Art: Alison Lapper pregnant

Individualism and Art:
Alison Lapper pregnant


This is a sculpture by Marc Quinn being exhibited in Trafalgar Square.

It's a great example of controversial art and defiant individualism, doing what seems right to you, no matter what anybody else thinks about it.

I can't wait for Carrie Snell, of the infamous A Grain of Salt blog, to see this.

http://omnamaste.blogspot.com

Carrie is pregnant now and I post this to cheer her up about how she looks with a baby in her belly.

This is a "differently formed" woman who is proud of her body, even though it looks a lot different from most other human women.

I got this via the blog Learning Aesthetics

in the post "knowledge"

http://littlepath.com/wp/?p=63

The blog author is feeling sad, thinking of quiting the blog scene. Please don't quit. We need you. I am very impressed with this discovery on your blog.

The original article is at The Guardian.


[QUOTE--from The Guardian article]

Lapper, 40, an artist and photographer, said:

"I am very hopeful that this sculpture will make a difference.

If you look at it, it is very beautiful as a piece of art.

Disabled people are not vulgar, or ugly, or grotesque, and hopefully people will recognise that."

She recalled the exhausting day four years ago when Quinn, best-known for his self-portrait made from 9 pints of his own frozen blood, cast her naked, pregnant body in plaster. "Who would have imagined that five years on it would be in Trafalgar Square?"

[END QUOTE]

Be yourself--don't submit to any religion, tradition, politics, or peer pressure that doesn't seem right.

Think your own thoughts. Blog your own blog, and be confident that, even if you don't get a zillion comments, someone is blessed and benefiting from your individual voice.

[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:^)

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Fight for goodness, blogger

Fight for goodness, blogger

I personally feel that each and every blogger has a duty.

Your duty is to fight.

You ought to consider engaging in some blogocombat now and then. Isn't there something you really hate? Something that is horribly wrong in this stinking world? What annoys you? What could you warn others about?

It's nice to post brilliant thoughts, clever jokes, fascinating anecdotes, cheery stories, and astute analysis.

But don't you care about others and the dangers they face?

Don't you wish to somehow make this world a little better?

Then get on it.

Find something you can write about, something that you know, that most people probably are clueless about.

You surely know something I don't know, something I need to know.

Post it, then slam a comment on to this blog to let me know what you posted.

It's fun to fight.

Relish your life and purpose on earth!


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate


Gotta go rake pretty autumnal leaves, so my wife will be happy.


:^)

Urgent Warning about Sony music CDs




Urgent Warning re Sony BMG


NOTE: This is an exact replica of an article I published at Vaspers the Grate.

[EDIT UPDATE 2]

Sony has been forced by Blogospheric Wrath, and other forces, to temporarily stop this sleazy policy.

NEW: Fox news provides an Associated Press report, dated Nov. ll, 2005, on how Sony is "temporarily" suspending production of this "anti-piracy" scheme:

"Sony to Stop Controversial CD Software"
http://www.foxnews.com/
story/0,2933,175326,00.html

[QUOTE]

Sony defended its right to prevent customers from illegally copying music but said it will halt manufacturing CDs with the [DRM brand] technology as a precautionary measure.

"We also intend to re-examine all aspects of our content protection initiative to be sure that it continues to meet our goals of security and ease of consumer use," the company said in a statement.

The antipiracy technology, which works only on Windows computers, prevents customers from making more than a few copies of the CD and prevents them from loading the CD's songs onto Apple Computer's popular iPod portable music players.

Some other music players, which recognize Microsoft's proprietary music format, would work.

Sony's announcement came one day after leading security companies disclosed that hackers were distributing malicious programs over the Internet that exploited the antipiracy technology's ability to avoid detection.

Hackers discovered they can effectively render their programs invisible by using names for computer files similar to ones cloaked by the Sony technology.

[END QUOTE]


Please notice how Sony stupidly says they have "goals of security and ease of consumer use".

This is outright bullshit, people.

Their number one goal is profit, not network security or consumer happiness. If they gave a flipping fig about corporate network security, they would have never moved forward with a rootkit installation approach to DRM (digital rights management).

Every IT guy or gal knows this is a wrong-headed, supremely selfish strategy.

Thanks, Sony assholes, for opening vulnerabilities in corporate networks, so all the hacker cracker cyber-vandal bullies can slip right in.

Guess how long it will take for cyber criminals to exploit these security holes now blasted wide open.

I sure hope your company doesn't allow employees to listen to music CDs on the company computers as they work.


See the recent Google SE results on Sony CD DRM:

http://news.google.com/news?
hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&ncl=
http://www.betanews.com/article/
Sony_BMG_Pulling_Controversial_
DRM/1131735499

Make the scumbags feel our WRATH!

[END EDIT UPDATE 2]



[EDIT UPDATE 1:]

List of infected Sony CDs

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/
technology/4424254.stm

Trey Anastasio - "Shine"
Celine Dion - "On ne Change Pas"
Neil Diamond - "12 Songs"
Our Lady Peace - "Healthy in Paranoid Times"
Chris Botti - "To Love Again"
Van Zant - 'Get Right with the Man"
Switchfoot - "Nothing is Sound"
The Coral - "The Invisible Invasion"
Acceptance - "Phantoms"
Susie Suh - "Susie Suh"
Amerie - "Touch"
Life of Agony - "Broken Valley"
Horace Silver Quintet - "Silver's Blue"
Gerry Mulligan - "Jeru"
Dexter Gordon - "Manhattan Symphonie"
The Bad Plus - "Suspicious Activity"
The Dead 60s - "The Dead 60s"
Dion - "The Essential Dion"
Natasha Bedingfield - "Unwritten"
Ricky Martin - "Life"

DO NOT BUY, or play on your computer, any of these CDs!

[END EDIT UPDATE]


Listen up, for your own good.

Protect yourself from evil psycho-capitalistic schemes.

Boycott Sony BMG. Look closely at any music CD you buy. Make sure it's not on the Sony BMG label. A Sony BMG compact disk is bad news for your computer.

Get fired up with real aggressive hate, and take your rage out on Sony BMG. Scumbags.

blogosphere = blogs-of-fear

Blogs causing fear and dread, with massive financial loss, in deserving targets.

Boycott Sony BMG. Never buy any Sony BMG musical artist products. To buy any Sony CDs may pose serious threats to your computer and network. Scumbags.

Warn everyone you know about Sony BMG, their music products on compact discs, and their selfish, destructive, anti-consumer policy regarding DRM (digital rights management/manipulation).

Here's a follow-up to my original warning, "Are Sony CDs evil?" The answer is a resounding "Yes, they're evil alright."

I'll let John Borland at CNet explain it again to you.



"Sony CD protection sparks security concerns"
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: November 1, 2005, 2:15 PM PST

[QUOTE]

Mark Russinovich was doing a routine test this week of computer security software he'd co-written, when he made a surprising discovery: Something new was hiding itself deep inside his PC's guts.

It took some time for Russinovich, an experienced programmer who has written a book on the Windows operating system for Microsoft, to track down exactly what was happening, but he ultimately traced it to code left behind by a recent CD he'd bought and played on his computer.

The SonyBMG-produced Van Zant album had been advertised as copy-protected when he'd bought it on Amazon.com, and he'd clicked through an installation agreement when he put the disc in his computer. What he later found is that the software had used a sophisticated cloaking technique that involves a "rootkit"--something not dangerous in itself, but a tool often used by virus writers to hide all traces of their work on a computer.

What's new:

Copy-protection software on CDs produced by SonyBMG is cloaked by a technique that involves a "rootkit," which is designed to hide and protect the software on the user's computer.

Bottom line:

Rootkit tools often are used by virus writers to hide malicious software, and security experts say rootkit mechanisms used by recording companies could be misused by others. That threat is only theoretical so far, but the debate continues between consumers and record companies about what copy-protection technologies are necessary and appropriate.



"We're still trying to find a line between fair use and digital rights management, and it is going to take issues like this, with discussions between lawmakers and industry, to come up with what's fair and honest," Russinovich said. "But I think this has gone too far."

Russinovich posted a detailed step-by-step account of his findings on his blog, drawing immediate criticism of SonyBMG's technology from some inside the security software community.

The passionate response underlines the power copy protection retains to inflame emotions and spark bitter debate, despite the growing string of chart-topping albums that have been released over the past year with the protections included.

A handful of security companies weighed in on the issue, saying the rootkit could present a possible--if still theoretical--risk to computers.

The creator of the copy-protection software, a British company called First 4 Internet, said the cloaking mechanism was not a risk, and that its team worked closely with big antivirus companies such as Symantec to ensure that was the case. The cloaking function was aimed at making it difficult, though not impossible, to hack the content protection in ways that have been simple in similar products, the company said.

In any case, First 4 has moved away from the techniques used on the Van Zant album to new ways of cloaking files on a hard drive, said Mathew Gilliat-Smith, the company's CEO.

"I think this is slightly old news," Gilliat-Smith said. "For the eight months that these CDs have been out, we haven't had any comments about malware (malicious software) at all."

A SonyBMG representative said the software could be easily uninstalled, by contacting the company's customer support service for instructions. Those instructions are not specifically available on the Web site that answers questions about the company's copy protection tools.

Rootkit realities

Rootkit software has been around for over a decade but has recently come to increased prominence as more writers of viruses and the like adopt it for their purposes. Essentially, rootkits are tools for digging deep into a computer's operating system to hide the fact that certain software files exist or that the computer is performing certain functions.

Unlike other, less-powerful means of hiding files on a hard drive, rootkits are created to be extraordinarily difficult to uninstall without specific instructions, rooting themselves in an operating systems' deepest recesses in order to prevent their deletion.

In the case of the SonyBMG software, trying to remove it manually could shut off access to the computer's CD player, researchers said.

Security researchers note that simply hiding something doesn't make it a threat, and the SonyBMG software is designed to hide the digital rights management tools that prevent unauthorized copies of the CD from being made.

However, it does remain active in the background of a computer, taking up a small amount of memory, even when the CD is not being played. Thus the rootkit software does have the potential to be misused by others, according to some researchers.

The First 4 Internet software's technique for hiding files is broad enough that it could be adopted by virus writers, allowing them to hide their own tools on computers that have run the software from the CD, say some security experts.

[END QUOTE]



Now, please go read the entire article. Then Google the phrase: "Sony CD", and see what more you can discover. Expect butt-kissers to rise up to defend Sony, and to moan about "music pirates", and other ignorant greedy whinings.

This really stinks, for any company to go this far to protect, not artists, not consumers, but their bloated compensations and profits.

It's all about squeezing the maximum amount of hard earned cash from unsuspecting consumers.

Do something important with your life. Here are five (5) simple tasks you should consider performing...



5 Basic Ways to Fight Back

(1) Research: investigate the matter via Google or other search engine probes, using various keywords and phrases.

(2) Non-comply: Never agree to any Install Agreement dialog box that appears unexpectedly with any product that normally requires no special installations, like a music CD.

(3) Boycott: refuse to buy any further products from a company that has such a piss poor attitude toward customer service and consumer relations.

(4) Protest: email complaints and hatred to the CEO of any offending company. How dare these scumbags be so brazen in using malware type cloaking to secretly invade your computer, and to introduce potential vulnerabilities into your network.

(5) Revolt: post warnings and advice on your blog, regarding such dangerous, arrogant, and counter-productive corporate behavior. Send emails to friends, associates, other bloggers about this problem. Tell others at work, at church, in the mall, on the street, everywhere, about the dangers and risks associated with such products.

Information without transformation is useless.


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Character blogs are pseudo blogs



Character blogs are pseudo blogs


Character blogs are lies.

They violate several of the nine universal blog core values, such as authenticity, passion, transparency, honesty, relevance, and integrity.

For example, a Talking Moose is irrelevant to ice cream, it is not an authentic spokesperson, it can't have any legitimate passion about anything, it's opaque, dishonest, and insincere.

Can a rational company sincerely believe that a phony personality is a good spokesperson for them? There are many problems associated with this concept.

If a stupid company has to "make up a character" to deliver their message, something is wrong to begin with.

This is the sign of a lazy, arrogant, user-unfriendly business.

They are too lazy or ignorant to find a real advocate, an actual satisfied user, or a genuine and real corporate spokesperson, like the CEO or Sales Manager. How about a Customer Service department head?

Every business has a logical and actual spokesperson who can interact with consumers via blog comments and email.

Why a fictional character?

As Amy Gahran has said, it can be appropriate in rare cases. Ronald McDonald or Mickey Mouse could have a blog, and still represent the organization accurately, in an expected and fitting manner.

We must be careful that "story" is not a clever euphemism for "untruth" or deliberate falsification to sell more product to unsuspecting nit wits.

The fictional character "pretends" to use the product, or to be an expert, spokesperson, or representative of the company. Or the character is irrelevant, which is another strike against using it.

Consumers are not fooled so easily anymore. And they don't like to be jerked around.

Very few consumers are seeking entertaining "stories" at a business blog.

Most of the time, they seek information, product specifications and model comparisons, order forms, contact channels, staff profiles and credentials, company news, implementation advice, professional expertise, or a way to convey a question, complaint, suggestion, or appreciation.

When they want to converse with an organization, they generally don't wish to speak with a Talking Moose, Animated Elf, or Phony Personality who has unreal adventures that never happened.

For a character to say they traveled to France and discovered some great recipes, this is the height of insincerity, arrogance, and stupidity.

Tell the CEO to get off his ass and do what the fictional character claims to be doing. Then, with a real CEO having actual adventures, you'd have a good basis for a blog. True stories about real events is the way to establish credibility.

Character blogs in most cases are Pseudo Blogs, not a "new, creative" twist on blogs. I'm not saying, "stifle your imagination". What I am saying is this: don't use a blog for stupid purposes that violate consumer trust and marketing savvy.

Consumers don't like automated recorded messages when telephoning a company.

What makes anyone think they want to interact with a cartoon or other figment of the imagination?


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:*)

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Bob Dylan, business, and blogs





Bob Dylan, Business, and Blogs

John O'Leary has an interesting post, dated Novemeber 3, 2005, on the Tom Peters! blog, entitled "Creative Destruction".

http://www.tompeters.com/
entries.php?note=008320.php

It's about the recent PBS Martin Scorcese documentary on Bob Dylan "No Direction Home".



The only marketing minds I trust and respect unreservedly are:

* Tom Peters

* Christopher Locke

* Seth Godin

* Al Ries

* John Hagel




Check out the post, and my reply posted as a comment to it.


[QUOTE]

Creative Destruction

Folks I know are still abuzz over the Martin Scorsese documentary on Bob Dylan, No Direction Home, telecast a few weeks ago on the Public Broadcasting System.

It's no surprise that my musician and actor friends have been energized by it, but business clients, too?

What gives?



Maybe it's because so many leaders in business are baby boomers and Dylan was a major contributor to the soundtrack of their lives in their formative years. But more importantly, the film is a powerful reminder that it sometimes makes business sense to blow up what you're successfully doing and start over.

No Direction Home accurately portrays Dylan as a pioneer/mutineer who kept burning his bridges and creating new markets as he moved on.

Initially he branded himself as a traditional folk singer, then as a singer of self-penned topical protest songs, then as a stream-of-consciousness psychedelic poet, then as a rock star—before retiring, temporarily, in the late 1960s.

Want to see creative destruction in action?

Witness Dylan "going electric" at the Newport Folk Festival in 1965 (and in other concerts for the next two years) with a noisy band of rock musicians—a move that ENRAGED many of his core customers.

Yet Dylan picked up new customers with every reboot. He'd be loathe to call it a business strategy, but it was certainly a successful one.

Something here for us to learn?

John O'Leary posted this on 11/03.



[END QUOTE]





Now here's my rushed response, not even picking up on the central concept of "creative destruction" and "reinventing oneself", two topics I typically favor.


[QUOTE]

My VTG blog deals primarily with blogology and web usability issues, yet I was compelled to post about the Dylan Scorcese film broadcast on PBS.

I was stunned by the effect the Dylan documentary had on me. I immediately emailed my best friend in Hollywood, Bennett Theissen, and told him it was like a seminar.

Like a seminar. Fascinating to hear you write that many business people were inspired by that Dylan film. It is a charismatic non-conformist we look up to, Bob Dylan, the troubadour of troubled times.

Every business person needs a favorite poet, favorite protest singer, favorite subversive ideology, favorite social cause.

Mammonism is debunked by the Supreme Reality of the Blogosphere: the Rise of Individual Voice.

Two Way Interactive Conversation is a close second in importance, but Independent Thought/Individual Voice is the highest reality.

I will do a post quoting this one today.

Posted by Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate at November 6, 2005 12:55 PM


[REPLY by John O'Leary, to entire comment thread under this post]



"Low talent big media push?"

According to almost any songwriter, musician, or music critic you talk to, Dylan at his creative peak (say, 1963 to 1966?) along with the Beatles was the biggest creative force in popular music in the last half century.



Every critics’ poll I’ve seen reflects this.

Dylan’s freewheeling lyrical style (alternately acerbic, mystical, impressionistic) single-handedly altered the direction of the Beatles’ creativity (especially John Lennon's) and the pop music landscape in the sixties.

Almost no pop music artist dared to perform socially relevant music or sing blatantly poetic lyrics B.D. (before Dylan).

Dylan’s influence can be heard in the singer-songwriter movement beginning in the 1970s, all the way to rock/hip-hop stars of today.

No Dylan = no Bono, no Eminem.

Dylan’s lyrics are the subject of college courses (even at Harvard) and 34 books.



Google turns up 170,000 results for "dylan lyrics."

No other single pop/rock music performer, from Elvis on, has been subject to as much academic analysis and scrutiny. (Now whether one LIKES his songs, his singing, his politics, his religious views, etc. is a different matter.)

Posted by John O'Leary at November 6, 2005 01:15 PM


[END QUOTE]



Saturday, November 05, 2005

Supreme Reality of the Blogosphere


Supreme Reality of the Blogosphere
What do think it is?

Self-expression? Partly. But there's more to it than that. People have been expressing themselves for thousands of years.

Did you know that the bicameral mind theorists state that in ancient societies there was no "self" or "me" as we understand it today.

The ancients were regimented slaves to rulers who claimed to be supernatural "gods" in human form. The enslaved citizens robotically obeyed, not the inner voice of self, not their reason or instincts, but the psychologically implanted voice of the god, the ruler, the screwbag dickweed who called himself the incarnation of his crummy idea of a "god".

Remnants of this idea linger in the "don't question authority" school of thought. This is one reason why I call myself an "Ethical Anarchist" with no political affiliation. I hate all politicians and anyone who tries to bully, deceive, or manipulate others.

Corporations and governments, many of them, bully, deceive, and manipulate others. This will result, thanks to the internet, web, and blogosphere, in their total and permanent destruction.

The supreme reality of the blogosphere is the Rise of the Voice of the Individual. It's the consumer vs. the corporation. We consumers are gaining more power, via Google searches, and via blogging, with mass blog storms against our enemies.

Bad governments and corrupt corporations have plenty to fear from individuals, independent thought, and blogs. We bloggers have every right to cause fear and loathing in evil entities and organizations.

Corporations want you to think the Two Way Conversation is the supreme reality of the blogosphere. That's a lie. They want to deceive you into thinking they're willing and eager to hear from you.

But the only thing a corporation wants to do with a blog is somehow use it to make money. Do you think very many of them sincerely wish to listen to your problems, complaints, suggestions, recommendations, questions?

Ha ha ha.

What planet do you live on?

One of my dear fellow bloggers disagreed with me concerning this issue.

In Dave Taylor's post about the Forbes anti-blog article, Debbie Weil advocates the theory that corporations still wield great power, and that the supreme reality of the blog is the two way conversation, that corporations and consumers can become friends.

Here is my reply, posted at Dave Taylor's Intuitive Life Business Blog.

[QUOTE]

You are wrong Debbie Weil. It is our world now, and the corporations are dead.

Huge corporations, governments, and other institutions will be crumbling and falling. This is no hysterical outpouring of a raging soul. This is market research and educated predictions.

The New York Times article "Just Googling It Is Striking Fear Into Companies" explains very nicely how the Power is coming to the People.

People, consumers are gaining more power, as corporations and institutions lose it steadily and surely.

We tricked businesses into blogging, NOT so we could hear from them, but so they would hear from us, all our groans, complaints, grievances, praises, suggestions, questions, anger, love, and disgust.

The archaic corporate culture defenders hate this. It's NOT the "interactive two way conversation" that is primary, though I champion this aspect and believe in enabling comments on all blogs.

It's the Voice of the Individual that is the Supreme Reality of the Blogosphere.

Grassroots revolution, Power to the People, the overthrow of MSM info hegemony and corporate corruption.

We are winning the war against Mammonism, Ignorance, and Greed.

Debbie, you will see with your own eyes the Fall of Corporate Power and Repressive Regimes.

The blog, and Google, are making it happen much sooner than originally expected by the Cluetrainers and Tim Berners-Lee. But their vision is Truth.

[END QUOTE]


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate

:*)

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

blogging is revolutionary




blogging is revolutionary


[NOTE: This is an exact replica, with alternate title, of a recent post published at Vaspers the Grate, republished here.]


I, the supreme commander of the blogophilic forces engaged in domestic defense of the blogosphere itself, I must thunder again from Mount Sinai:

blogs are not

"just
about"

online journaling,
political ranting,
or web marketing.

blogs are not
just
digital diaries.

blogs are not
just
online vending machines.

blogs are not
just
mini-web sites.

blogs are not
just
colloboration hubs.

blogs are not
just
confession booths
of trivial travail.

blogs are not
just
public email
message boards.

blogs are not
just
slow chat rooms.

blogs are not
just
another channel for
advertising,
public relations,
and
political advocacy.

blogs are not
just
photo/art display pages.

blogs are not
just
outlets for self-expression.


I mean, the blog is all
these things, and more
.


But the real, historic significance, the essential reality of the blog is this:
the blog is

the
Universalization
of
Web Content.




No other communication zone, aside from word of mouth and telephones, has been universalized.

Every one has a mouth, that typically can generate sounds that can be taken as language.

Every one has a telephone. Did you know that homeless people are turning into geeks? They are using mobile phones to establish credibility on job applications, and to network with each other and various services.

Every one can have a blog. Even homeless people can use a library computer or make friends with someone who has a computer and internet access, or use a computer at an state funded public employment agency, or a college. Usually all you need is an ID card.

Blogger makes the creation and maintenance of a blog simple, easy, and reliable for all, at no charge for the basic service.

Blogs are about revolution,


about overthrowing the
information hegemony
of the Morbid Stream Media,


(1) blogs are all about--smart mouthed, overwise, triumphalistic, invincible, ideological thought war activism

(2) blogs are all about--disloyalty proliferation, niche eating, establishing dominance in a not yet existing market arena, proclaiming the doctrines of a future philosophy that has not yet been thought.

(3) blogs enable us to install
our expertise, our passion,
and perhaps our products...

...in a theoretical space,
a conjectural market
with no consensus-reality yet,
and no consuming entities.

Yet.

Then the "not yet" turns into a "now yes".




Ideological Definitions
of "Blog"


Blogs are the opposite of terrorism, as they champion fearless, independent thinking.

Blogs are the democratization of global information.

Blogs are the voice of the consumer rising up against corporate bullies and frauds.

Blogs are the grassroots with marching boots.

Blogs are the mirror image of translucent data delivery.

Blogs are the new two-way communication interaction machines of the mind and beyond.

Blogs are electro-telepathic.

Blogs are archives of the collective consciousness of humanity.

Blogs are upheaval, challenge, iconoclastic, anti-establishment, corrosion of tradition, usurpation of mass media, light-speed quantum leap of individual mind to the total overmind of accumulated belief-system scrapyard dog cruelty kisses.

Blogs blow minds, build bridges, bend business, betray bulge and bilge.

The early bloggers were antagonized, persecuted, marginalized, outcasted, and in retaliation, they began their own secret communication channel.

Blogs were first called "What's Next" pages within networks that connected geeks, academia, computer/software manufacturers and technical services, and the military.

Blogs did NOT start as "What My Baby Did Today", "Why I Want You to Buy My Products", or "Why Politician X is Bad and Politician Y is Good" sites.

Blogs began as technical information exchanges.

Let this sink into your mind and memory.



Blogs were "logs" or displayed and archived lists of other internet resources, activities, products, software, servers, and all things related to the computing community.

While the jocks were slurping beer and watching other men touch men in contact sports, the "nerdy geek computer freaks" were inventing a whole new world and a way to navigate it.

The blog, at its primal root essential core, is not a confession booth, political platform, business tool, or ideology transmission tower.

Blogs are a new way of communicating, interacting, and networking for human beings.


[signed] Steven Streight aka Vaspers the Grate